MEMORANDUM

______________________________________

As you will remember, following a full investigation, the Seattle Office of the National Labor Relations Board concluded that Oak Harbor had engaged in multiple violations of federal labor law around the time the strike began in September 2008, and again in February and March, 2009, when the strike ended.

As a result of a number of settlements, the main issue left to be decided by the Administrative Law Judge was whether the company broke the law when it unilaterally ceased pension and retiree health and welfare coverage (placing contributions in an escrow account) and changed current employees health and welfare coverage when the strike ended.

The Union’s trial attorneys report that the trial could hardly have gone better on this issue. As you probably know, company attorney John Payne had repeatedly claimed that he and Bob Braun had an agreement with the Union to give “returning strikers” company health and welfare and to place their pension and retiree contributions into an escrow account at a bank. Yet, once placed under oath, attorney Payne admitted that this was a “misstatement”. He admitted that (as Union leaders Al Hobart and Buck Holliday had testified) any such alleged agreement was expressly limited to people who had crossed the picket line during the strike, and had nothing to do with “returning strikers” when the strike ended. As the Government’s lawyer established that attorney Payne had repeatedly reiterated this “misstatement” in his communications with the NLRB, some of the starch appeared to go out of him. His two young associate lawyers, both of whom sat beside Payne through virtually the entire trial, were powerless to rescue him.

Equally heartening, in discussions that were partly off the record, the Administrative Law Judge appeared to reject the company’s main defense. He indicated that the company could not contend that it did not have an obligation under federal to continue to honor the benefits provisions of the expired collective bargaining agreement when the strike ended.

Finally, The Union’s trial attorneys report that the company largely failed to articulate a defense to the Government’s charges. The Judge, the Government’s attorneys, and the Union’s attorneys repeatedly challenged the company’s attorneys to state their defenses and to confirm or deny particular defenses. For the most part, the company maintained an awkward silence or did not respond directly or clearly, saying that it would deal with all issues in its post-hearing brief.

While the Union is optimistic, it cannot of course, guarantee victory. At present, it appears the company’s defense is based entirely upon technicalities, and we do not know whether the Judge will be impressed by them.

Post-hearing briefs will be submitted by all parties on September 30, 2010. A decision is expected several months after that.

The Union is also extremely pleased with its settlements of several other Government charges against the company. We are elated to welcome back 174 member Travis Tuttle, who was illegally fired after the strike. Travis has been reinstated with partial back pay. Numerous Auburn and Portland drivers whose reinstatements were illegally delayed received supplemental wage payments totaling tens of thousands of dollars. Two Auburn Local 763 members also received payments for a delayed offer of reinstatement and a improper layoff. Portland member Mike Neubauer, who was illegally fired after the strike, decided to take a healthy buyout and move on to other endeavors. We wish him all the best.

The Union remains committed to a negotiated solution and invites the company to forward a response to the Union’s comprehensive offer of April 15, 2010.

______________________________________

FROM: JOHN A. WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT
JOINT COUNCIL OF TEAMSTERS NO. 28

RE: OAK HARBOR MEMORANDUM

MAY 25, 2010

On Sunday, May 23, 2010, Oak Harbor responded to the Union's proposal that was given to the Company on Thursday, April 15, 2010. The Company has indicated that they are unwilling to enter into a new agreement that includes either the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan or the Washington Teamsters Retirees Welfare Trust.

Based on these serious issues, it is unlikely that any contract settlement can be achieved prior to the National Labor Relations Board trial which is set to begin Monday, June 28, 2010.

While disappointed with the Company's position, we will push forward with the National Labor Relations Board and will also be ready to return to the bargaining table when appropriate.

Fraternally,

John A. Williams, President
Joint Council of Teamsters No. 28

______________________________

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Teamsters at ABF Freight System rejected a 15 percent wage cut by a solid majority, sending the less-than-truckload carrier and union back to the negotiating table.

The ABF employees rejected the proposed wage cut 56 percent to 44 percent, with about 80 percent of the company's 7,400 union workers participating in the vote.

The rejection of a wage cut and gain-sharing plan negotiated by the international union will make it tougher for ABF to return to profitability, transportation analysts said.

ABF, the country's fourth-largest LTL carrier, lost $99 million in 2009, compared with a $45 million profit in 2008. It had an operating loss of $35.7 million in the first quarter.

Read more: ABF Teamsters Reject Wage Cut / Journal of Commerce

______________________________

On Monday, April 19, leaders of freight local unions from across the country overwhelmingly endorsed an economic relief plan for ABF Freight System, Inc. that will protect thousands of Teamster members? jobs and their health, welfare and pension benefits... Read More

POWERPOINT: ABF Freight System: Company Overview

HANDOUTS: ABF Freight System: Company Overview

______________________________